Skip to main content
Download PDF

Vector competence of Swedish Culex pipiens mosquitoes for Japanese encephalitis virus

Parasites & Vectors volume 17, Article number: 220 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is an emerging mosquito-borne Orthoflavivirus that poses a significant public health risk in many temperate and tropical regions in Asia. Since the climate in some endemic countries is similar to temperate climates observed in Europe, understanding the role of specific mosquito species in the transmission of JEV is essential for predicting and effectively controlling the potential for the introduction and establishment of JEV in Europe.

Methods

This study aimed to investigate the vector competence of colonized Culex pipiens biotype molestus mosquitoes for JEV. The mosquitoes were initially collected from the field in southern Sweden. The mosquitoes were offered a blood meal containing the Nakayama strain of JEV (genotype III), and infection rates, dissemination rates, and transmission rates were evaluated at 14, 21, and 28 days post-feeding.

Results

The study revealed that colonized Swedish Cx. pipiens are susceptible to JEV infection, with a stable infection rate of around 10% at all timepoints. However, the virus was only detected in the legs of one mosquito at 21 days post-feeding, and no mosquito saliva contained JEV.

Conclusions

Overall, this research shows that Swedish Cx. pipiens can become infected with JEV, and emphasizes the importance of further understanding of the thresholds and barriers for JEV dissemination in mosquitoes.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Japanese encephalitis (JE) is an important zoonotic disease transmitted by mosquitoes. It ranks among the world's foremost causes of encephalitic illnesses, and has a particular impact on the Asia–Pacific region [1]. JE is endemic in 24 countries, ranging from Pakistan to Japan, within South and Southeast Asia, northern Australia, and Oceania, where more than three billion individuals are at risk of infection [2]. It is estimated that the annual incidence of JE is approximately 69,000 cases; however, this figure is likely an underestimate due to inadequate surveillance systems and the absence of precise diagnostic tools [3]. Notably, JE causes a substantial disease burden, resulting in an estimated annual loss of 709,000 disability-adjusted life years [4], which emphasizes the considerable public health challenge that JE presents to affected regions.

Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) was first identified in Japan in 1935, and the virus has subsequently been reported in other Asian countries. The infection dynamics in humans are wide ranging, with seroprevalence studies suggesting that only one in 250 infections in humans is symptomatic [5, 6]. However, in 20%–30% of clinical JE cases patients die, and 30%–50% of survivors manifest severe neurological and/or psychiatric disorders [7,8,9,10,11].

JEV is a member of the Japanese encephalitis virus antigenic complex, and belongs to the genus Flavivirus within the family Flaviviridae [12]. It is characterized as a positive single-stranded RNA virus with a genome length of approximately 11,000 nucleotides, encoding a polyprotein that undergoes proteolytic cleavage into three structural and seven non-structural proteins [13]. Five genotypes are identified through genomic phylogeny, and they display partially overlapping distributions in Asia [14].

The transmission cycle includes pigs and wading birds, which both can serve as amplifying hosts for the virus [15, 16]. JEV relies on mosquitoes for its transmission between hosts, with species of the genus Culex acting as key vectors. The main JEV vector species are Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Culex vishnui and Culex gelidus [17,18,19]. On a local scale, various other species, especially within the genus Culex, can serve as vectors when locally abundant [20]. In Europe, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus has been reported in Greece [21]; however, several other Culex species, such as Culex pipiens, are widespread across the continent and serve as important vectors of other orthoflaviviruses, such as West Nile virus (WNV) and Usutu virus (USUV), as well as the alphavirus Sindbis virus (SINV) in Fennoscandia [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Recent studies have also shown that Cx. pipiens from France [29], China [30] and the UK can transmit JEV in a laboratory setting [31, 32].

JEV constitutes a significant contributor to viral encephalitis cases in Asia [33], and a comprehensive understanding of its potential introduction and establishment in Europe is vital for public health preparedness. JEV RNA has been detected in different samples collected in Italy, all showing maximum similarity (99%) with JEV genotype III [34]. The samples include a formalin-fixed bird tissue sample collected in 1997, six samples from birds collected in 2000, and one pool of European Cx. pipiens mosquitoes collected from the field in 2010 [34, 35]. Current climate models project increasing global temperatures and changes in climatic zones [36], which may render Europe more hospitable to JEV transmission [37]. Simultaneously, ongoing environmental transformations, such as urbanization and alterations in wetland ecosystems, have the potential to impact mosquito populations and their interactions with avian hosts [38]. Coupled with the heightened global mobility of both people and livestock, there is the potential for JEV to emerge in previously uncharted regions [18, 39]. Given the importance of Cx. pipiens as a vector for West Nile virus, USUV, and Sindbis virus in Europe, and its wide distribution in Sweden, it is important to determine the ability of local Cx. pipiens to transmit JEV [40,41,42]. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of a genotype III JEV strain to infect colonized Swedish Cx. pipiens and assess the capability of these mosquitoes to act as vectors for JEV.

Methods

Mosquito strain

Culex pipiens (biotype molestus) mosquitoes were originally collected in Gothenburg, Sweden in 2016 [43]. The mosquitoes were reared in the mosquito laboratory of the Zoonosis Science Centre at Uppsala University under maintained conditions of 21 °C ± 1 °C and 70% ± 5% relative humidity with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. Adult mosquitoes were provided 10% sugar solution ad libitum and were given defibrinated horse blood (sourced from Håtuna lab, Uppsala, Sweden) mixed with 5% sugar on a weekly basis.

Virus strain and cell lines

The Nakayama JEV strain (GenBank no. EF571853), a genotype III virus, was obtained from the University of Ljubljana Heritage Collection by Professor Avšič-Županc via the European Virus Archive Global (SKU reference 007V-03215). This virus was first isolated in 1935 in Japan from human cerebrospinal fluid, and has since been cultivated on Vero E6 cells. In our lab it was propagated on C6/36 cells and passage five and six were used in the described experiments.

Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) were grown in Leibovitz's L-15 medium (L-15) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% tryptose phosphate broth (TPB) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 100 units per millilitre (U/mL) each of penicillin and streptomycin (penstrep) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 28 °C without CO2. Infected cells were incubated for 5 days in L-15 with 2% FBS, 10% TPB, and 1% penstrep at 28 °C without CO2. Viruses were harvested and stored at − 80 °C.

Golden hamster kidney cells clone C13 (BHK21) (Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald, Germany) were used for virus titration. These were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penstrep at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

Virus titration

Virus titration was performed using the 50% tissue culture infective dose per millilitre (TCID50/mL) on BHK-21 cells. Cells were seeded at a density of 1.3 × 104 cells/well in 200 µL DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS and 1% penstrep in cell culture-treated 96-well plates. A tenfold serial dilution of the virus was prepared in DMEM with 2% FBS, and 100 µL of virus dilution was added per well. Virus dilutions ranging from 1:102 to 1:1011 were tested in six wells each. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 3 days. On day 3, the cytopathic effect (CPE) was determined visually (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) and quantified by a tetrazole [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; MTT (M2128; Sigma-Aldrich)] cell viability assay, as previously described [44]. Briefly, cells were treated overnight with 10 µL of 5 mg/mL MTT solution in phosphate-buffered saline. The formazan crystals that formed were solubilized by adding 100 µL of a 10% SDS, 0.01 M HCl solution. After overnight incubation, optical densities (ODs) were read at 570 and 690 nm by using a Tecan Infinite M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan Trading, Switzerland). OD readings at different wavelengths were subtracted and the mean OD value and SD of the uninfected control was calculated. Wells with OD lower than the mean OD of the uninfected controls minus 3 SDs were considered infected (infected well OD < mean control wells OD – 3 × SD), while wells with OD equal or higher than that of the mean OD of the uninfected control minus 3 SD were considered uninfected (uninfected well OD ≥ mean control wells OD – 3 × SD). TCID50/mL was calculated using the Spearman–Kärber method, implemented as a Web tool by Lei et al. (available at https://www.virosin.org/tcid50/TCID50.html#Spearman-method) [45].

Mosquito infection experiments

Mosquito infections were performed in the BSL-3 laboratory of the Zoonosis Science Centre in accordance with previous studies [23, 46,47,48]. Female mosquitoes aged 7–14 days were deprived of sugar solution for 24 h before being presented with an infectious blood meal. The blood meal, a 1:4 mixture of virus suspension and horse blood, had a determined viral titer of 6.81 × 106 TCID50/mL for mosquitoes incubated for 14 or 21 days, and 1.47 × 106 TCID50/mL for mosquitoes incubated for 28 days after a single freeze–thawing cycle. The mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 2–3 h at 25 °C in the dark, using half a cotton pad soaked with the virus-blood mixture. Fully engorged females were moved to 300-mL plastic cups and maintained at 25 °C ± 1 °C with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle for 14, 21, and 28 days, representing intermediate, late, and very late stages of orthoflavivirus infection in this mosquito species and at the selected temperature [49]. Throughout this period, the mosquitoes had ad libitum access to 10% sugar solution. A schematic overview of the workflow is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic overview of the vector competence analysis workflow. Female mosquitoes were offered an infectious blood meal, a 1:4 mixture of virus suspension and horse blood. Mosquitoes were allowed to feed for 2–3 h at 25 °C in the dark. Engorged mosquitoes were incubated for 14, 21, and 28 days, representing intermediate, late, and very late stages of orthoflavivirus infection, respectively. To assess Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) replication, body, legs and saliva were collected on days 14, 21, and 28 post-feeding. Saliva was obtained through forced salivation. Samples were transferred to microtubes containing mosquito buffer for homogenization. JEV detection was performed by using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with specific primers designed in-house. RT-qPCR-positive samples were further analysed by inoculating homogenates on C6/36 cells. Development of the cytopathic effect was monitored and supernatant collected after 3 days for subsequent RT-qPCR analysis. Workflow figure created in BioRender.com (accessed on 11 December 2023)

Full size image

To examine the replication of JEV in various parts of individual mosquitoes, the body, legs and saliva were collected on days 14, 21, and 28 post-feeding (PF) (Fig. 1). Saliva was obtained through forced salivation, as described previously [50, 51]. In brief, female mosquitoes were freeze-sedated for 5 min, and their legs were collected. The proboscis was then placed into a tube filled with 10 µL of oil for 30 min at room temperature, after which the collected saliva in oil was extracted. Subsequently, the body, legs and saliva of each mosquito were individually transferred into 1.5 mL-microtubes containing 300 µL of mosquito buffer [phosphate-buffered saline (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific)] supplemented with 20% FBS, 1% penstrep, and 1% amphotericin B (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The body and leg samples were homogenized at 25 Hz for 90 s using 5-mm stainless steel beads in a Minilys personal homogenizer bead mill (Bertin, MD).

JEV detection in mosquito bodies, legs and saliva

Bodies of all blood-fed mosquitoes that survived the incubation period, as well as leg and saliva samples from individuals with bodies containing JEV RNA, were analysed. Viral RNA was extracted using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Elution was carried out in 30 µL of water. JEV was detected in a reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay using the QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The forward primer 5′-GGCTAGCCTACAAGGTGGCG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CTCTCGCCCATTCGGGTGAC-3′ were designed in-house. They amplify a 110-base pair-long sequence in the NS5 gene region of the JEV genome. The PCR reaction mix contained 12.5 μL of 2× QuantiTect SYBR RT-PCR Master Mix (HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, QuantiTect SYBR RT-PCR Buffer, dNTP mix, including dUTP, ROX passive reference dye, 8 mM MgCl2, and SYBR Green I dye), 6.25 μL RNAse-free water, 0.5 μL forward primer, 0.5 μL reverse primer, and 0.25 μL QuantiTect RT Mix (Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase and Sensiscript Reverse Transcriptase) per reaction. A total of 20 μL Master Mix was used for each reaction well and 5 µL of extracted RNA was used as template. PCRs were run using the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with 30-min reverse transcription at 50 °C, 15 min initial activation at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, followed by a step-wise temperature increase from 65 to 95 °C to examine the dissociation characteristics of the amplified products. The temperature at which 50% of amplified DNA is dissociated is defined as the melting temperature, and can be observed as a peak in the graph of the negative first derivative of the melting curve. Samples were considered positive when a SYBR signal was obtained [≤ 40 threshold cycle value (Ct)], and the melting temperature was 81 °C ± 1 °C. The detection limit of the assay was between one and 10 copies/µl.

Homogenates of positive body and leg samples were inoculated on monolayers of C6/36 cells in 96-well plates to examine them for replicating virus (Fig. 1). Homogenate (100 µL) and L-15 medium (100 µL) containing 2% FBS, 10% TPB, 1% penstrep, and 1% amphotericin B were added simultaneously to the cells. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 28 °C. At day 3, cells were inspected for CPE and supernatant was collected. RNA was extracted and analysed by RT-qPCR as described above. Ct values before and after cell inoculation were compared to assess for virus replication.

Data analysis

The number of JEV-positive bodies was divided by the total number of surviving blood-fed females at each timepoint to determine the infection rate (IR). Dissemination rate (DR), indicating the viral spread through the mosquito body, was calculated as the number of JEV-positive legs divided by the number of JEV-positive bodies. The transmission rate (TR), was calculated as the number of JEV-positive saliva samples divided by the number of JEV-positive bodies.

To identify statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.05) in infection, dissemination, and transmission across different timepoints, chi-square and simple logistic regression tests were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 10.0.0 for MacOS, GraphPad Software, Boston, MA; www.graphpad.com.)

Results

Feeding and survival rates of mosquitoes under laboratory conditions

Feeding rates ranged between 73 and 79%, and survival rates dropped from 90% at 14 days PF to 49% at 28 days PF (Table 1). The number of mosquitoes sampled at each timepoint ranged from 21 to 40 individuals (Table 1). All individuals for a given collection point were fed at the same time. The titers of the blood meals were equally diluted at two timepoints, once for the 14- and 21-day and once for the 28-day experiments, but subsequent titrations gave a slightly lower virus titer for the 28-day incubation (Table 1).

Table 1 Blood meal titres (50% tissue culture infective dose per millilitre; TCID50/mL) and mosquito feeding/survival rates for each timepoint
Full size table

Oral susceptibility, dissemination and transmission rates of JEV

The IR, DR, and TR were calculated for Cx. pipiens females at 14, 21, and 28 days PF. JEV was detected in the bodies at all timepoints, in one leg sample at 21 days and in none of the saliva samples (Table 2; Additional file 2: Table S1). There was no significant difference in IR over the three timepoints [p = 0.942 (χ2 = 0.12, df = 2)] (Fig. 2a). The DR, i.e. the number of mosquitoes where JEV was also detected in the legs, was 0% at both 14 and 28 days PF, and 20% at 21 days PF (Table 2; Fig. 2a). JEV was not detected in the saliva at any timepoint in this experiment, and the TR was therefore 0% (Table 2; Fig. 2a).

Table 2 Infection, dissemination and transmission rates of Japanese encephalitis virus in Culex pipiens mosquitoes at three timepoints
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

JEV-positive body, leg and saliva samples in Culex pipiens females following the ingestion of JEV and subsequent incubation for 14, 21 and 28 days. a Percentages of infected mosquitoes compared to non-infected ones after ingesting a JEV-spiked blood meal (infection rate), percentages of infected mosquitoes with JEV-positive legs (dissemination rate), and percentages of infected mosquitoes with positive saliva (transmission rate). Statistical comparison was performed using the chi-square test (ns not significant). b Simple logistic regression of the probability of mosquito body infection over time (|Z|= 0.20, p = 0.85, slope = no significant deviation from 0)

Full size image

Logistic regression was used to analyse the relationship between the incubation time and whether mosquitoes were infected or not (Fig. 2b). It showed that the probability of infection of the mosquito body was stable over time with no statistical support for a non-zero slope (p = 0.85). The probabilities that legs were infected could not be calculated based on only one positive sample.

To analyse if samples in which viral RNA was detected by RT-qPCR contained replicating virus, mosquito homogenate from RNA-positive samples was inoculated into C6/36 cells and the supernatant was collected and analysed for viral RNA after 3 days. CPE and a > 3 Ct value decrease was observed in one body sample and the corresponding leg sample at 21 days PF, indicating viable virus (Additional file 2: Table S1). CPE and a < 3 Ct value decrease was observed in one body sample at 14 days PF and four body samples at 21 days PF, potentially indicating viable virus (Additional file 2: Table S1). One body sample at 14 days PF showed CPE but no decrease in Ct value, and another body sample showed neither CPE nor a decrease in Ct value. The samples at 28 days PF showed CPE but no decrease in Ct value (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Discussion

In this study, we aimed to determine the infection dynamics of laboratory colony-derived Swedish Cx. pipiens mosquitoes for genotype III JEV. Our findings indicate that the investigated Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are susceptible to JEV genotype III infection. However, at 25 °C, the virus only disseminated within one individual mosquito, and was not found in the saliva of any of the infected mosquitoes. Viable virus, CPE and a decrease in Ct value were detectable in one mosquito body after 14 days PF, in five bodies after 21 days PF, and in one leg sample at 21 days PF. CPE but no Ct decrease was observed in body samples at 28 days PF and in one body at 14 days PF. The observation of CPE for cells without detectable levels of viral RNA (by PCR) could indicate the possibility of cell death due to an unidentified factor beyond viral infection or, less likely, that viable virus may have been present in the sample but at an extremely low level that did not result in a reduction in the Ct value of the original sample. Another body at 14 days PF did not show CPE and no Ct value decrease was observed. The virus titers of the blood that was used differed slightly between the 14- and 21-day group and the 28-day group. The latter had a slightly decreased titer; however, the difference was so small that it is not believed to have had a significant impact on the results. These findings suggest that, under the conditions of our experiment, the laboratory colony-derived Swedish Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are not competent vectors for JEV genotype III.

The observed IR was consistent across all timepoints (Fig. 2a), whereas a disseminated infection was only observed in one sample, at 21 days PF. In mosquitoes, viruses face multiple physical barriers during infection, and it appears that JEV has limited ability to escape the midgut cells in the investigated Cx. pipiens. Experimental findings from other Cx. pipiens populations from the UK (the Wirral Peninsula), France (Montpellier and Nice) and China (Shanghai) showed that mosquitoes native to those regions are competent vectors at 18–28 °C and infectious blood meal titers of 8 × 106 focus-forming unit/mL, 4.47 × 108 TCID50/mL, and 1 × 106 plaque-forming unit/mL, respectively [29,30,31]. Blood titers in the natural hosts of JEV, i.e. pigs and birds, experimentally infected with JEV are reported to range from 103 to 105 TCID50/mL, thus lower than the level used in most experimental studies on mosquito vector competence [52,53,54,55,56,57]. In the present study, we used titers that enabled comparison with previous experimental studies. A different study found that British Cx. pipiens populations could become infected with JEV at 20 °C, but that infection at a temperature of 25 °C was needed for the virus to be detected in the saliva of the mosquitoes [32]. Since JE cases in Taiwan have been associated with temperatures above 22 °C and relative humidity between 70 and 74% [58], there is potentially a critical temperature needed for JEV to disseminate and infect the salivary glands of Cx. pipiens [32]. However, another British study found that 72% of Cx. pipiens contained JEV RNA in saliva after 21 days at 18 °C, corresponding to a very high transmission rate [31]. In that study, JEV genotype II (strain CNS138-11) was used to infect the mosquitoes, while we used genotype III and did not detect any virus RNA in mosquito saliva after incubation at 25 °C. Another study examining JEV replication and sensitivity to temperature in avian and mosquito cells demonstrated that a GI-b isolate exhibited notably higher infectivity titers in mosquito cells between 24 and 48 h post-infection compared to the GI-a and GIII isolates [59]. Together, these results suggest that Cx. pipiens from diverse origins can become infected with JEV and, under certain conditions, as discussed above, also transmit the virus, but that the temperatures required for virus dissemination may vary between viral strains.

JEV is primarily endemic in Asia, particularly in Japan, China and Korea, and parts of Southeast Asia, and has recurrently spread into north-eastern continental Australia [60, 61]. These regions are characterized by a tropical, humid climate with consistently elevated temperatures, in contrast to temperate zones, where the climate is seasonal, with mild summers and winter temperatures that may drop below 0 °C for prolonged periods. The Nakayama strain was isolated from Japan, which is in the more temperate part of the dissemination range of JEV. JEV RNA has been occasionally detected in mosquitoes in Europe, but autochthonous transmission has never been observed [35]. Nevertheless, alterations in climate patterns have led to prolonged, warmer summers in the region [36, 62], leading to extended periods during the summer months with temperatures that support JEV transmission by native mosquitoes. Temperature and virus strains seem to influence the ability of Cx. pipiens to become infected and transmit JEV [29,30,31, 63]. Previous studies have demonstrated that laboratory colony-derived Swedish Cx. pipiens are capable vectors for USUV, a close relative of JEV in the Orthoflavivirus family, which is not currently established in Sweden [64]. Gaining insight into the vulnerability of naïve vector species in temperate zones to emerging tropical viruses is crucial for developing preventive disease intervention approaches. In addition, risk assessments for vector-borne diseases are needed when promoting changes such as increased wetland coverage to sustain increased biodiversity.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that Swedish Cx. pipiens mosquitoes are susceptible to JEV genotype III infection. However, under the conditions of our experiment at 25 °C, the virus was inefficient in disseminating within the laboratory colony-derived mosquitoes, and was not detected in mosquito saliva. This study emphasizes the importance of gaining a deeper understanding of the thresholds and barriers for JEV dissemination in mosquitoes. Further exploration of the environmental conditions necessary for JEV transmission in temperate climates is crucial for public health preparedness, especially since the current shifts in climate and ecological landscapes may favour the emergence of JEV in previously unaffected regions. Studying viruses for which vaccinations are available is crucially highlighted not only by the reported shortage of the JEV vaccine according to agencies like the German Robert Koch Institute [65], but also by the fact that recommendations for vaccination hinge upon comprehensive risk assessment, which emphasizes the importance of understanding the vectors involved in the transmission of these viruses. Vaccine shortages further emphasize the necessity for multifaceted preparatory measures beyond merely making vaccines available, with knowledge of vectors as one essential part of this.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of the study must be available within the article.

References

  1. Lindahl J. Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs and vectors in the Mekong Delta with special reference to urban farming (doctoral thesis). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mackenzie JS. Emerging zoonotic encephalitis viruses: lessons from Southeast Asia and Oceania. J Neurovirol. 2005;11:434–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell GL, Hills SL, Fischer M, Jacobson JA, Hoke CH, Hombach JM, et al. Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89:766–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Lopez AD. Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1:e114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramli NS, Ismail NM, Zaini N, Hayati F, Jeffree MS, Abdul Rahim SSS, et al. Seroepidemiological studies on Japanese encephalitis: a systematic review. Oman Med J. 2022;37:e366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Japanese encephalitis statpearls. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK470423/. Accessed 4 May 2024.

  7. Grewe S, Gliem M, Abrar DB, Feldt T, Wojtecki L, Tan V, et al. Myelitis with flaccid paralysis due to Japanese encephalitis: case report and review of the literature. Infection. 2022;50:1597–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Filgueira L, Lannes N. Review of emerging Japanese encephalitis virus: new aspects and concepts about entry into the brain and inter-cellular spreading. Pathogens. 2019;8:111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Solomon T, Kneen R, Dung NM, Khanh VC, Thuy TT, Ha DQ, et al. Poliomyelitis-like illness due to Japanese encephalitis virus. Lancet. 1998;351:1094–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung CC, Lee SS, Chen YS, Tsai HC, Wann SR, Kao CH, et al. Acute flaccid paralysis as an unusual presenting symptom of Japanese encephalitis: a case report and review of the literature. Infection. 2007;35:30–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer M, Lindsey N, Staples JE, Hills S. Japanese encephalitis vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59:1–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon T, Ni H, Beasley DW, Ekkelenkamp M, Cardosa MJ, Barrett AD. Origin and evolution of Japanese encephalitis virus in southeast Asia. J Virol. 2003;77:3091–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chambers TJ, Hahn CS, Galler R, Rice CM. Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1990;44:649–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuh AJ, Ward MJ, Leigh Brown AJ, Barrett AD. Phylogeography of Japanese encephalitis virus: genotype is associated with climate. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams DT, MacKenzie JS, Bingham J. Flaviviruses. In: JJ Zimmerman LAK, A Ramirez, KJ Schwartz, GW Stevenson, J Zhang, editors. Diseases of swine. 11th ed: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. p. 530–43.

  16. Ladreyt H, Durand B, Dussart P, Chevalier V. How central is the domestic pig in the epidemiological cycle of Japanese encephalitis virus? A review of scientific evidence and implications for disease control. Viruses. 2019;11:949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira AR, Cohnstaedt LW, Cernicchiaro N. Japanese encephalitis virus: placing disease vectors in the epidemiologic triad. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2018;111:295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pearce JC, Learoyd TP, Langendorf BJ, Logan JG. Japanese encephalitis: the vectors, ecology and potential for expansion. J Travel Med. 2018;25:S16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudeep AB. Culex gelidus: an emerging mosquito vector with potential to transmit multiple virus infections. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014;51:251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliveira ARS, Strathe E, Etcheverry L, Cohnstaedt LW, McVey DS, Piaggio J, et al. Assessment of data on vector and host competence for Japanese encephalitis virus: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Vet Med. 2018;154:71–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lytra I, Emmanouel N. Study of Culex tritaeniorhynchus and species composition of mosquitoes in a rice field in Greece. Acta Trop. 2014;134:66–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Engler O, Savini G, Papa A, Figuerola J, Groschup MH, Kampen H, et al. European surveillance for West Nile virus in mosquito populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:4869–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernández-Triana LM, de Marco MF, Mansfield KL, Thorne L, Lumley S, Marston D, et al. Assessment of vector competence of UK mosquitoes for Usutu virus of African origin. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fros JJ, Miesen P, Vogels CB, Gaibani P, Sambri V, Martina BE, et al. Comparative Usutu and West Nile virus transmission potential by local Culex pipiens mosquitoes in north-western Europe. One Health. 2015;1:31–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tolsá-García MJ, Wehmeyer ML, Lühken R, Roiz D. Worldwide transmission and infection risk of mosquito vectors of West Nile, St. Louis encephalitis, Usutu and Japanese encephalitis viruses: a systematic review. Sci Rep. 2023;13:308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brugman VA, Hernández-Triana LM, Medlock JM, Fooks AR, Carpenter S, Johnson N. The role of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in virus transmission in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lumley S, Hernández-Triana LM, Horton DL, Fernández de Marco MDM, Medlock JM, Hewson R, et al. Competence of mosquitoes native to the United Kingdom to support replication and transmission of Rift Valley fever virus. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hesson JC, Verner-Carlsson J, Larsson A, Ahmed R, Lundkvist Å, Lundström JO. Culex torrentium Mosquito role as major enzootic vector defined by rate of Sindbis virus Infection, Sweden, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:875–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. De Wispelaere M, Desprès P, Choumet V. European Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens are competent vectors for Japanese encephalitis virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hameed M, Liu K, Anwar MN, Wahaab A, Safdar A, Di D, et al. The emerged genotype I of Japanese encephalitis virus shows an infectivity similar to genotype III in Culex pipiens mosquitoes from China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chapman GE, Sherlock K, Hesson JC, Blagrove MSC, Lycett GJ, Archer D, et al. Laboratory transmission potential of British mosquitoes for equine arboviruses. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Folly AJ, Dorey-Robinson D, Hernández-Triana LM, Ackroyd S, Vidana B, Lean FZX, et al. Temperate conditions restrict Japanese encephalitis virus infection to the mid-gut and prevents systemic dissemination in Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:6133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Suresh KP, Nayak A, Dhanze H, Bhavya AP, Shivamallu C, Achar RR, et al. Prevalence of Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus in mosquitoes and animals of the Asian continent: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15:942–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Platonov AE, Rossi G, Karan LS, Mironov KO, Busani L, Rezza G. Does the Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) represent a threat for human health in Europe? Detection of JEV RNA sequences in birds collected in Italy. Eurosurveillance. 2012;17:20241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ravanini P, Huhtamo E, Ilaria V, Crobu MG, Nicosia AM, Servino L, et al. Japanese encephalitis virus RNA detected in Culex pipiens mosquitoes in Italy. Euro Surveill. 2012;17(28). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2807/ese.17.28.20221-en.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McCarthy JJ. Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

  37. Petrić D, Bellini R, Scholte E-J, Rakotoarivony LM, Schaffner F. Monitoring population and environmental parameters of invasive mosquito species in Europe. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Perrin A, Glaizot O, Christe P. Worldwide impacts of landscape anthropization on mosquito abundance and diversity: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol. 2022;28:6857–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gould EA, Higgs S, Buckley A, Gritsun TS. Potential arbovirus emergence and implications for the United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:549.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindström A. History of human-biting Culex pipiens in Sweden and Scandinavia. J Eur Mosquito Control Assoc. 2017;35:10–2.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hesson JC, Östman Ö, Schäfer M, Lundström JO. Geographic distribution and relative abundance of the sibling vector species Culex torrentium and Culex pipiens in Sweden. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:1383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and European Food Safety Authority. Mosquito maps [Internet]. Stockholm: ECDC; 2023.

  43. Hesson JC, Schäfer M, Lundström JO. First report on human-biting Culex pipiens in Sweden. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:632.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Luttens A, Gullberg H, Abdurakhmanov E, Vo DD, Akaberi D, Talibov VO, et al. Ultralarge virtual screening identifies SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors with broad-spectrum activity against coronaviruses. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144:2905–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lei C, Yang J, Hu J, Sun X. On the calculation of TCID(50) for quantitation of virus infectivity. Virol Sin. 2021;36:141–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weger-Lucarelli J, Rückert C, Chotiwan N, Nguyen C, Garcia Luna SM, Fauver JR, et al. Vector competence of American mosquitoes for three strains of Zika virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0005101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Faizah AN, Kobayashi D, Amoa-Bosompem M, Higa Y, Tsuda Y, Itokawa K, et al. Evaluating the competence of the primary vector, Culex tritaeniorhynchus, and the invasive mosquito species, Aedes japonicus japonicus, in transmitting three Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;14:e0008986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hernández-Triana LM, Folly AJ, Sewgobind S, Lean FZX, Ackroyd S, Nuñez A, et al. Susceptibility of Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus to Japanese encephalitis virus. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Anderson SL, Richards SL, Tabachnick WJ, Smartt CT. Effects of West Nile virus dose and extrinsic incubation temperature on temporal progression of vector competence in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2010;26:103–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Heitmann A, Jansen S, Lühken R, Leggewie M, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Tannich E. Forced salivation as a method to analyze vector competence of mosquitoes. J Vis Exp. 2018(138). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3791/57980-v.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dubrulle M, Mousson L, Moutailler S, Vazeille M, Failloux A-B. Chikungunya virus and Aedes mosquitoes: saliva is infectious as soon as two days after oral infection. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5895.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ricklin ME, Garcia-Nicolas O, Brechbuhl D, Python S, Zumkehr B, Posthaus H, et al. Japanese encephalitis virus tropism in experimentally infected pigs. Vet Res. 2016;47:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ricklin ME, Garcia-Nicolas O, Brechbuhl D, Python S, Zumkehr B, Nougairede A, et al. Vector-free transmission and persistence of Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Park SL, Huang Y-JS, Lyons AC, Ayers VB, Hettenbach SM, McVey DS, et al. North American domestic pigs are susceptible to experimental infection with Japanese encephalitis virus. Sci Rep. 2018;8:7951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Redant V, Favoreel HW, Dallmeier K, Van Campe W, De Regge N. Efficient control of Japanese encephalitis virus in the central nervous system of infected pigs occurs in the absence of a pronounced inflammatory immune response. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Xiao C, Wang X, Cui G, Pang L, Xu J, Li C, et al. Possible pathogenicity of Japanese encephalitis virus in newly hatched domestic ducklings. Vet Microbiol. 2018;227:8–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Karna AK, Bowen RA. Experimental evaluation of the role of ecologically-relevant hosts and vectors in Japanese encephalitis virus genotype displacement. Viruses. 2019;11:32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Lin C-L, Chang H-L, Lin C-Y, Chen K-T. Seasonal patterns of Japanese encephalitis and associated meteorological factors in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Schuh AJ, Ward MJ, Brown AJL, Barrett ADT. Dynamics of the emergence and establishment of a newly dominant genotype of Japanese encephalitis virus throughout Asia. J Virol. 2014;88:4522–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Mansfield KL, Hernández-Triana LM, Banyard AC, Fooks AR, Johnson N. Japanese encephalitis virus infection, diagnosis and control in domestic animals. Vet Microbiol. 2017;201:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rosen L. The natural history of Japanese encephalitis virus. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:395–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Temperaturens ökning i Sverige sedan 1800-talet. https://www.smhi.se/kunskapsbanken/klimat/sveriges-klimat/temperaturens-okning-i-sverige-sedan-1800-talet-1.158913. Accessed 4 May 2024.

  63. Auerswald H, Maquart PO, Chevalier V, Boyer S. Mosquito vector competence for Japanese encephalitis virus. Viruses. 2021;13:1154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Krambrich J, Bole-Feysot E, Höller P, Lundkvist Å, Hesson JC. Vector competence of Swedish Culex pipiens mosquitoes for Usutu virus. One Health. 2024;18:100707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Miranda-García MA, Hoffelner M, Stoll H, Ruhaltinger D, Cichutek K, Siedler A, et al. A 5-year look-back at the notification and management of vaccine supply shortages in Germany. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(17). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.17.2100167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University. This research was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research innovation program [grant no. 874735 (VEO)], and the SciLifeLab Pandemic Preparedness projects (LPP1-007 and REPLP1:005). It was also supported by the Metropolitan Mosquitoes Project funded by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning (Formas, grant no. 2016-00364), by the INFECT project funded by the Swedish Research Council (grant no, 2022-01166), and the Carl Trygger Foundation (project no. CTS 21:1522).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden

    Janina Krambrich, Dario Akaberi, Johanna F. Lindahl, Åke Lundkvist & Jenny C. Hesson

  2. International Livestock Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Johanna F. Lindahl

  3. Department of Animal Health and Antibiotic Strategies, Swedish National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden

    Johanna F. Lindahl

  4. Biologisk Myggkontroll, Nedre Dalälvens Utvecklings AB, Gysinge, Sweden

    Jenny C. Hesson

Authors
  1. Janina Krambrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Akaberi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johanna F. Lindahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Åke Lundkvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jenny C. Hesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, JK, DA, JCH, and ÅL; data curation, JK and DA; formal analysis, JK and DA; funding acquisition, ÅL and JFL; investigation, JK and DA; methodology, JK and JCH; project administration, JK; supervision, JK and JCH; visualization, JK; writing—original draft JK; and writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Krambrich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Cell cytopathic effect of JEV on BHK21 cells.

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Summary of PCR results for all analysed samples.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krambrich, J., Akaberi, D., Lindahl, J.F. et al. Vector competence of Swedish Culex pipiens mosquitoes for Japanese encephalitis virus. Parasites Vectors 17, 220 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13071-024-06269-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13071-024-06269-7

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us