Skip to main content

Table 7 Capturing efficacy of 3D-WDST relative to the treatment hut and the control hut

From: Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania

 

Capturing efficacy relative to the treatment hut

HMopen % (95% CI)

MMopen % (95% CI)

HMbaffles % (95% CI)

MMbaffles % (95% CI)

Total mosquitoes

25.07 (12–38.15)

29.34 (10–48.7)

22.11 (− 2.36–46.58)

49.58 (23.39–75.78)

Female

26.51 (9.65–43.37)

31.95 (8.96–54.94)

23.01 (− 3.35–49.36)

50.72 (19.79–81.65)

Anophelines

 Total

21.63 (9.79–33.46)

27.67 (10.23–45.1)

19.99 (− 4.71–44.68)

48.42 (21.33–75.51)

 Female

24.44 (8.06–40.82)

30.55 (9.39–51.71)

21.06 (− 6.39–48.52)

50.19 (18.97–81.4)

Culicine

 Total

55.42 (12.16–98.68)

41.19 (− 4.89–87.26)

41.67 (− 9.92–93.26)

55.56 (2.88–10.2)

 Female

27.43 (− 17.17–72.03)

47.22 (− 7.44–101.9)

50 (− 7.48–107.5)

38.89 (− 12.6–90.38)

 

Capturing efficacy relative to control hut

HMopen

MMopen

HMbaffles

MMbaffles

Total mosquitoes

21.92 (4.83–39)

21.58 (9.48–33.66)

59.19 (− 79.32–197.7)

80.33 (− 26.3–187)

Female

27.17 (1.46–52.88)

25.08 (12.98–37.18)

69.56 (− 90.09–229.2)

95.36 (− 36.52–227.2)

Anophelines

 Total

21.13 (2.80–39.45)

22.82 (10.72–34.91)

58.31 (− 83.1–199.7)

84.13 (− 34.51–202.8)

 Female

30.44 (− 1.14–62.02)

27.8 (14.86–40.75)

63.68 (− 88.71–216.1)

92.08 (− 32.41–216.6)

Culicine

 Total

53.53 (− 37.21–144.3)

16.49 (0.34–32.64)

66.67 (− 60.43–193.8)

66.67 (12.47–120.9)

 Female

33.27 (− 45.32–111.9)

10.35 (− 2.36–23.06)

16.67 (− 26.18–59.51)

25 (− 18.9–68.9)