Skip to main content

Table 1 Estimated linear trends over time for the NIP, DON and DIN for each location and for all locations combined

From: Seasonal patterns and spatial variation of Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato) infections in Ixodes ricinus in the Netherlands

Sampling sites

NIPa

DONb

DINb

Odds ratio

p value

Ratio

p value

Ratio

p value

Bilthoven

0.82

< 0.01

1.18

0.01

0.95

0.49

Dronten

0.93

0.32

0.83

0.02

0.80

0.01

Ede

0.84

< 0.01

1.02

0.76

0.80

< 0.001

Gieten

0.96

0.39

1.11

0.07

1.05

0.43

Hoog Baarlo

0.81

< 0.01

1.18

< 0.01

0.86

0.02

Kwade Hoek

1.03

0.13

0.99

0.94

1.13

0.56

Montferland

0.90

0.05

1.04

0.37

0.92

0.22

Schiermonnikoog

1.01

0.89

1.00

0.99

0.94

0.47

Twiske

0.83

< 0.001

1.10

0.04

0.91

0.21

Vaals

NAc

NAc

0.92

0.28

1.03

0.73

Veldhoven

0.99

0.93

1.27

< 0.001

1.11

0.23

Wassenaar

0.95

0.04

1.10

0.02

1.08

0.09

All locations

0.92

< 0.001

1.07

< 0.01

0.96

0.10

  1. DIN, Density of infected nymphs; DON, density of questing nymphs; NIP, nymphal infection prevalence
  2. aExpressed as the odds ratio, that is, the ratio between the odds of ticks being infected in two consecutive years
  3. bExpressed as the ratios between the rates of (infected) ticks in consecutive years
  4. cNA indicates that the model-fitting algorithm did not converge