Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation on two types of paramyosin vaccines for the control of Haemaphysalis longicornis infestations in rabbits

Parasites & Vectors volume 14, Article number: 309 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Haemaphysalis longicornis is an obligate hematophagous ectoparasite that transmits a variety of pathogens causing life-threatening diseases in humans and animals. Paramyosin (Pmy) is not only an invertebrate-specific myofibrillar protein but also an important immunomodulatory protein. Therefore, it is one of the ideal candidate antigens for vaccines.

Methods

We conducted two vaccine trials to evaluate the protective efficacy of Pmy recombinant protein (rPmy) and peptide vaccine (KLH-LEE). Each rabbit was immunized with three doses of rPmy or KLH-LEE adjuvanted with Freund’s complete/incomplete at 500 μg/dose at 2-week intervals before challenge with 40 female H. longicornis/rabbit. PBS plus adjuvant, Trx or KLH was used as control group. The antibodies of rabbits were detected by ELISA. Then, female ticks were fed on the rabbits until detachment.

Results

ELISA results showed that both vaccines induced rabbits to produce antibodies. Compared with the Trx group, the engorgement weight, oviposition and hatchability of the rPmy group decreased by 8.87%, 26.83% and 38.86%, respectively. On the other hand, engorgement weight, oviposition and hatchability of female ticks in the KLH-LEE group correspondingly resulted in 27.03%, 53.15% and 38.40% reduction compared with that of the KLH group. Considering the cumulative effect of vaccination on the evaluated parameters, results showed 60.37% efficacy of the rPmy vaccine formulation and 70.86% efficacy in the KLH-LEE group.

Conclusions

Pmy and particularly epitope LEE have potential for further development of an effective candidate vaccine to protect the host against tick infection.

Graphical Abstarct

Background

Ticks are obligate hematophagous ectoparasites, which are the most important vectors of disease-causing pathogens in domestic and wild animals [1]. Tick control is mainly dependent on the application of acaricides. However, the application of insecticides induces the drug resistance of ticks and increases environmental contamination [2, 3]. Therefore, vaccination is considered an effective method to control ticks [4, 5].

Paramyosin (Pmy) is not only a myofibrillar protein exclusively found in invertebrates, but also an important immunomodulatory protein in helminth infections [6,7,8]. McManus et al. [9] used the Schistosoma japonicum recombinant Pmy (rec-Sj-97) expressed by Escherichia coli to vaccinate water buffaloes and achieved 49% reduction of egg counts and 34% reduction of worm burden. Yang et al. [8] also verified that immunization of BALB/c mice with recombinant Pmy from Trichinella spiralis (rTs-Pmy) provided 36.2% reduction in muscle larva burden following challenge infection. Furthermore, the protective epitope of Pmy from T. spiralis and Taenia solium, named YX1 [10] and SP2 [11], respectively, was screened by phage display epitope analysis to develop a subunit vaccine. Therefore, Pmy is one of the ideal candidate antigens for vaccines in endoparasites, but rarely reported in ticks.

Haemaphysalis longicornis is distributed in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea and China [12]. It is an important vector in the transmission of Babesia, Theileria and other tick-borne diseases [13, 14]. In our previous study, a full-length cDNA encoding H. longicornis Pmy was cloned, and vaccination with Pmy plasmid DNA provided an overall efficacy of 50% in immune protection of rabbits [15, 16]. To compare the different types of Pmy vaccine, the protective epitope of H. longicornis Pmy was calculated by multiple alignment with the endoparasite Pmy epitope YX1 [10] and SP2 [11], and results showed that it was a peptide (LEEAEGSSETVVEMNKKRDTE) named LEE close to the N-terminal of Pmy protein. In addition, the secondary structural analysis of H. longicornis Pmy suggested that LEE had non-helical segments within an α-helical structure, consistent with that of YX1 and SP2. Thus, we prepared the peptide vaccine (KLH-LEE) and Pmy recombinant protein (rPmy) of H. longicornis in this study. Various biological parameters of female ticks were analyzed to compare the immunological protection from two types of Pmy vaccines.

Methods

Ticks and animals

Haemaphysalis longicornis were maintained by feeding on New Zealand white rabbits, and New Zealand white female rabbits, 4 months old, were purchased from Experimental Animal Center of Hebei Medical University as previously described [16]. All animal-related protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Hebei Normal University (approval number 2020LLSC05).

Production and purification of recombinant proteins

Total RNA was extracted from five unfed female ticks using an RNA purification kit (Axygen, Union City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA templates were synthesized using total RNA (2 μg) through a ThermoScript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The full-length H. longicornis Pmy gene was amplified from cDNA templates using the specific primers containing restriction sites underlined as follows: forward primer, 5′-GAATTCATGTCTAGC-AGGAGCAGCAAGT-3′ (EcoR I); reverse primer, 5′-GCGGCCGCCTAGAAGTTC-TGGCTGGTCTCTT-3′ (Not I). The reaction system and procedures are shown in Table 1. The PCR products separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis were digested by enzyme double digestion and cloned into pET-32 (a +) with T4 ligase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and the recombinant plasmid was named pET-32 (a +)-Pmy. The correct sequencing plasmid was transferred to E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain (TransGen, China) for expression. The expressed rPmy protein was identified by LC-MS/MS using a linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo, USA). The mass spectrometric data were searched in the UniProt protein database with ProtQuest software suite (ProtTech, USA).

Table 1 Cloning reaction system and conditions of the H. longicornis Pmy gene
Full size table

The expression conditions of the rPmy were optimized, including induction concentration of IPTG (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mM), induction temperature (18, 25, 30, 37 ℃) and induction time (2, 4, 6, 8, 20 h). The E. coli cells were collected through centrifugation at 12,000×g for 15 min and disrupted by ultrasonic disruption. The expression levels of the rPmy were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the rPmy was purified under optimal conditions through affinity chromatography using a Ni-column (GE Healthcare, USA) and eluted with different gradients of imidazole (50, 100, 200, 500 mM). Meanwhile, the empty vector pET-32 (a +) was used to express histidine-tagged thioredoxin (Trx) protein, and its purification method was the same as above. The protein concentration was detected by Bradford method [17].

Synthesis of peptide vaccine

The H. longicornis Pmy epitope LEEAEGSSETVVEMNKKRDTE named LEE [15], was synthesized by GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd., and 1 ml LEE (4 mg/mL) was coupled to 1 ml KLH (3 mg/mL) by SMCC method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The peptide vaccine was named KLH-LEE, which was stored at – 20 °C.

Determination of antibodies by ELISA

At 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days after the first immunization, blood was sampled from auricular veins of rabbits for antibody level analysis. In the immune sera, OD values at the same dilution were measured by ELISA, which reflected the antibody level [18]. In all ELISA tests, the 96-well microplates were coated with 1 µg of rPmy in 1.0 M carbonate buffer (100 μl/well), pH 7.4, at 4 °C overnight and then blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in PBS with Tween-20 (PBST) (100 μl/well) at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing three times with PBST, microplates were incubated with rabbit serum (100 μl/well) at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing three times with PBST again, microplates were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Solarbio, Beijing, China), diluted 1:10,000 in PBST, at 37 °C for 1 h (100 μl/well). TMB colored liquid was added to the microplates and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min in darkness. The reaction was stopped by adding 1.0 M H2SO4 (50 μl/well). Subsequently, the absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm was measured using an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Immunization and challenge of New Zealand white rabbits

Two vaccine trials were conducted to evaluate the protective efficacy of recombinant rPmy and KLH-LEE. In vaccine trial 1, six New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into three group, two rabbits in each group. In the experimental group, 0.5 ml rPmy (1 μg/μl) mixed with equal volumes of Freund’s complete adjuvant as the first dose was injected into the rabbit, respectively, and 0.5 ml rPmy (1 μg/μl) mixed with equal volumes of Freund’s incomplete adjuvant as the second dose and the third dose were injected into the rabbit at intervals of 2 weeks, respectively. Rabbits in the control group were immunized by the same protocol with 0.5 ml phosphate buffer saline (PBS) or 0.5 ml Trx protein (1 μg/μl) mixed with equal volumes of Freund’s complete/incomplete adjuvants. The whole experiment was repeated three times, and totally 18 rabbits were involved in the vaccine trial. In vaccine trial 2, six New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into three group, two rabbits in each group. Rabbits in each group were immunized with 0.5 ml KLH-LEE (1 μg/μl), 0.5 ml KLH (1 μg/μl) and 0.5 ml PBS, respectively. The method is the same as above and in total 18 rabbits were involved in the vaccine trial. At 10 days after the last immunization, rabbits in the vaccinated and control groups were infested with unfed tick adults on the ears of rabbits (40 female ticks/rabbit), and the female-to-male ratio was 1:1. The stage of feeding blood was recorded every day until the detachment of engorged female ticks, and the average engorgement weight, average egg mass weight and hatchability were also observed and recorded every day.

Statistical analysis

The data of each group were analyzed by SPSS 19.0 software. The effects of different biological parameters on female ticks were compared by Student’s t-test with unequal variance (P = 0.05). Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 100 × [1–(NET × EWPF × H)], where NET represents reduction in tick numbers from the number of biting ticks in experimental groups/Trx or KLH groups, EWPF represents reduction in weight of eggs from the average egg weight of per female adults in experimental groups/Trx or KLH groups, and H represents reduction in hatchability from hatchability in experimental groups/Trx or KLH groups [19].

Results and discussion

Pmy is a promising candidate vaccine antigen that has been confirmed in a variety of parasites [20,21,22,23,24]. To compare the efficacy of different types of Pmy vaccines, we prepared the peptide vaccine (KLH-LEE) and the Pmy recombinant protein (rPmy) of H. longicornis in this study. SDS-PAGE results showed that the molecular size of rPmy was about 118 kDa, which correlated with the previously calculated value [15]. After enzymatic hydrolysis, the peptides of rPmy proteins detected by LC–MS/MS matched with the Pmy protein of H. longicornis (Table 2), which implied the E. coli expression system correctly expressed the rPmy protein of H. longicornis. Comparing the results under different conditions, production of the rPmy protein was highest in supernatant induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 6 h at 25 °C (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Mass spectrometry identification of rPmy protein
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

SDS-PAGE analysis of rPmy protein expression in E. coli BL21 under the optimized conditions. M, marker; lane 1, production of the rPmy protein without IPTG; lane 2, lane 4, lane 6, lane 8, lane 10, production of the rPmy protein in the precipitation with IPTG at 25 °C for 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 h, respectively; lane 3, lane 5, lane 7, lane 9, lane 11, production of rPmy protein in the supernatant with IPTG at 25 °C for 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 h, respectively

Full size image

Cattle for immunization with the recombinant rPmy were infected with Dictyocaulus viviparus, and ELISA results showed that IgG of rPmy groups significantly increased compared with control groups [25]. Here, we also found that the antibody level of the rPmy group began to significantly increase at 7 days after the second immunization (t-test: t(11) = 4.60, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2a), and the antibody level of the KLH-LEE group began to significantly increase at the day of the second immunization (t-test: t(11) = 5.90, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). This suggested that the peptide vaccines could induce the host to produce antibodies more quickly than recombinant protein vaccine. Perhaps the LEE peptide coupled with KLH is easily recognized by B cells. And B cells could directly bind to the peptide antigen and start the expansion and antibody production process, speeding up the humoral response [26]. This finding was similar to the results of Contreras and de la Fuente [27]. Therefore, rabbits immunized with rPmy or KLH-LEE produced a humoral immune response.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Anti-Pmy antibody level in the rPmy or KLH-LEE group tested by ELISA. a Comparison of anti-Pmy antibody levels in the control group, Trx group and rPmy group. b Comparison of anti-Pmy antibody levels in the control group, KLH group and KLH-LEE group. The arrows indicate the time of immunization. Results are shown as means ± SEM, and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05)

Full size image

At 10 days after the last immunization, New Zealand white rabbits were challenged with ticks (Tables 3, 4). The analysis of variance by Student’s t test showed that there was no significant change in various biological parameters between the control group and Trx group (P > 0.05, Table 3). The rPmy group had a shorter feeding time compared with the Trx group (t-test: t(205) = 3.24, P < 0.005) (Fig. 3a). The engorgement weight, oviposition and hatchability in the rPmy group were reduced by 8.87%, 26.83% and 38.86% compared with the Trx group, respectively (t-test: t(205) = 3.49, P < 0.005; t-test: t(205) = 5.63, P < 0.005; t(179) = 12.16, P < 0.005, respectively) (Fig. 3b–d). Pmy is a structural component of invertebrate muscle cells [28, 29] and plays an important role in host immunomodulation by binding to complement components C8, C9 and C1q, thus inhibiting the formation of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC), and the Trichinella parasite can evade host complement attack [23, 30,31,32]. So, an antibody-mediated loss of function of the involved Pmy in the gut and ovary and enhancement of the host complement system could lead to imbalanced bloodmeal digestion, resulting in midgut structure and ovary development impairment and a subsequent reduction in the engorgement weight, oviposition of female H. longicornis and hatchability. In this article, the immune efficiency of rPmy was 60.37%, which was higher than Pmy DNA vaccine of H. longicornis (50%) [16]. This may be because DNA inoculation only produces low antigen expression in the range from picograms to nanograms, and the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines is low compared with that of protein vaccines [33]. However, the calculated vaccination efficacy of the rPmy (60.37%) was higher than 37.4% efficacy of subolesin from H. longicornis [34]. The results are attributed to different functions of rPmy and subolesin, and the antibodies they induced affect the development of ticks to different degrees.

Table 3 Control of H. longicornis infestation in rabbits vaccinated with rPmy
Full size table
Table 4 Control of H. longicornis infestation in rabbits vaccinated with KLH-LEE
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Tick collection data from rPmy vaccine evaluation trial 1. a Average feeding time of female adults. b Average engorgement weight of female adults. c Average oviposition of female adults. d Average hatchability. *Significantly different vs control group (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test). #Significantly different vs Trx group (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test)

Full size image

In addition, there was no significant change in various biological parameters between the control group and KLH group by t-test (P > 0.05, Table 4). The engorgement weight, oviposition and hatchability in the KLH-LEE group were reduced by 27.03%, 53.15% and 38.40% compared with the KLH group, respectively (t-test: t(224) = 8.45, P < 0.0005; t-test: t(224) = 10.48, P < 0.0005; t(214) = 16.38, P < 0.0005, respectively) (Fig. 4b–d), while the feeding time did not change significantly (t-test: t(224) = 1.54, P = 0.125) (Fig. 4a). The immune efficiency of KLH-LEE (70.86%) was higher than that of the rPmy vaccine (60.37%). This was consistent with the results of recombinant aquaporins from Ixodes ricinus, and the immune efficiency of CoAQP in the peptide group (80%) was higher compared with the recombinant protein IrAQP (32%) [27]. Furthermore, Rodríguez-Mallon et al. [35] also have confirmed that immune efficiency of the peptide vaccine pP0-KLH based on the ribosomal protein P0 of Rhipicephalus sanguineus is 90%, which is 39% higher compared with Bm86. Therefore, the immune efficiency of the peptide vaccine is better than that of the recombinant protein vaccine [36, 37]. One possible explanation for this phenomenon could be the fact that the concentration of the effective antigenic determinant LEE from peptide vaccine was higher compared with the recombinant protein, leading to an increase of anti-Pmy antibody levels in the host body. Thus, antibody-mediated loss of function of Pmy from peptide vaccine resulted in a significant reduction of engorgement weight, oviposition of female H. longicornis and hatchability [38]. Our results confirmed that Pmy, especially epitope LEE, was a candidate protective vaccine for the development of vaccines against ticks. Meanwhile, the safety evaluation of the vaccinated host should be considered to avoid the occurrence of autoimmunity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Tick collection data from KLH-LEE vaccine evaluation trial 2. a Average feeding time of female adults. b Average engorgement weight of female adults. c Average oviposition of female adults. d Average hatchability. *Significantly different vs control group (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test). #Significantly different vs KLH group (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test)

Full size image

Conclusions

Considering the evaluated parameters, vaccination results showed that Pmy, and particularly epitope LEE, partially protected rabbits against H. longicornis infection. Next, an eukaryotic expression system will be used to improve the vaccination efficiency, and combinations of multi-epitopes from different tick proteins may also have a synergistic effect, a subject for future study.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. The raw data used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Pmy:

Paramyosin

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

IPTG:

Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

PBST:

Phosphate buffer saline-Tween-20

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

TMB:

Tetramethylbenzidine

SPSS:

Statistical product and service solutions

NET:

Reduction in tick numbers

EWPF:

Reduction in weight of eggs per female

H:

Reduction in hatchability

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

KLH:

Keyhole limpet hemocyanin

MAC:

Membrane attack complex

References

  1. de la Fuente J, Estrada-Pena A, Venzal JM, Kocan KM, Sonenshine DE. Overview: ticks as vectors of pathogens that causes diseases in humans and animals. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6938–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonsson NN, Klafke G, Corley SW, Tidwell J, Berry CM, Koh-Tan HC. Molecular biology of amitraz resistance in cattle ticks of the genus Rhipicephalus. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018;23:796–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Richardson JR, Fitsanakis V, Westerink RHS, Kanthasamy AG. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138(3):343–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de la Fuente J, Kocan KM. Strategies for development of vaccines for control of ixodid tick species. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:275–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell EM, Burdin M, Hoppler S, Bowman AS. Role of an aquaporin in the sheep tick Ixodes ricinus: assessment as a potential control target. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:15–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lanar DE, Pearce EJ, James SL, Sher A. Identification of paramyosin as schistosome antigen recognized by intradermally vaccinated mice. Science. 1986;234(4776):593–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Muhlschlegel F, Sygulla L, Frosch P, Massetti P, Frosch M. Paramyosin of Echinococcus granulosus: cDNA sequence and characterization of a tegumental antigen. Parasitol Res. 1993;79(8):660–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang J, Yang Y, Gu Y, Li Q, Wei J, Wang S, et al. Identification and characterization of a full-length cDNA encoding paramyosin of Trichinella spiralis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;365(3):528–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McManus DP, Wong JYM, Zhou J, Cai C, Zeng Q, Smyth D, et al. Recombinant paramyosin (rec-Sj-97) tested for immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy against Schistosoma japonicum in mice and water buffaloes. Vaccine. 2001;20:870–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei J, Gu Y, Yang J, Yang Y, Wang S, Cui S, Zhu X. Identification and characterization of protective epitope of Trichinella spiralis paramyosin. Vaccine. 2011;29:3162–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gazarian KG, Solis CF, Gazarian TG, Rowley M, Laclette JP. Synthetic peptide-targeted selection of phage display mimotopes highlights immunogenic features of α-helical vs non-helical epitopes of Taenia solium paramyosin: implications for parasite- and host-protective roles of the protein. Peptides. 2012;34:232–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng H, Yu Z, Zhou L, Yang X, Liu J. Seasonal abundance and activity of the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) in North China. Exp Appl Acarol. 2012;56:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sivakumar T, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N. Babesia ovata: taxonomy, phylogeny and epidemiology. Vet Parasitol. 2016;229:99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou J, Ling F, Liu Y, Zhang R, Song X, Huang R, et al. A molecular survey of Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Bartonella and Theileria in ticks collected from southeastern China. Exp Appl Acarol. 2019;79(1):125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Zhang J, Yang S, Wang H, Zeng H, Zhang T, et al. Screening and molecular cloning of a protective antigen from the midgut of Haemaphysalis longicornis. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51(3):327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang TT, Zhang JC, Cui XJ, Zheng JJ, Li R, Wang F, et al. Evaluation of immune protection induced by DNA vaccines from Haemaphysalis longicornis paramyosin in rabbits. Parasite Vector. 2017;10:325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruger NJ. The Bradford method for protein quantitation. Methods Mol Biol. 1994;32:9–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Galay RL, Miyata T, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Maeda H, Kusakisako K, Tsuji N, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the potential of two ferritins as anti-tick vaccines against Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasite Vector. 2014;7:482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guerrero FD, Andreotti R, Bendele KG, Cunha RC, Miller RJ, Yeater K, et al. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus aquaporin as an effective vaccine antigen to protect against cattle tick infestations. Parasite Vector. 2014;7:475.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou S, Liu S, Song G, Xu Y, Sun W. Protective immunity induced by the full-length cDNA encoding paramyosin of Chinese Schistosoma japonicum. Vaccine. 2000;18:3196–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grekin L, Cohen R, Sodetz JM, Gold D, Fishelson Z. The role of paramyosin from blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni in inhibition of the complement system. Mol Immunol. 2008;45:4172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun H, Lin Z, Zhao L, Chen T, Shang M, Jiang H, et al. Bacillus subtilis spore with surface display of paramyosin from Clonorchis sinensis potentializes a promising oral vaccine candidate. Parasite vector. 2018;11:156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun R, Zhao X, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhao L, Zhan B, et al. Trichinella spiralis paramyosin binds human complement C1q and inhibits classical complement activation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(12):e0004310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gu Y, Huang J, Wang X, Wang L, Yang J, Zhan B, et al. Identification and characterization of CD4+ T cell epitopes present in Trichinella spiralis paramyosin. Vet Parasitol. 2016;231:59–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Strube C, Haake C, Sager H, Schorderet Weber S, Kaminsky R, Buschbaum S, et al. Vaccination with recombinant paramyosin against the bovine lungworm Dictyocaulus viviparus considerably reduces worm burden and larvae shedding. Parasite Vector. 2015;8:119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Friede M, Muller S, Briand JP, Van Regenmortel MHV, Schuber F. Induction of immune response against a short synthetic peptide antigen coupled to small neutral liposomes containing monophosphoryl lilip A. Mol Immunol. 1993;30(6):539–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Contreras M, de la Fuente J. Control of infestations by Ixodes ricinus tick larvae in rabbits vaccinated with aquaporin recombinant antigens. Vaccine. 2017;35:1323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cancela M, Carmona C, Rossi S, Frangione B, Goni F, Berasain P. Purification, characterization, and immunolocalization of paramyosin from the adult stage of Fasciola hepatica. Parasitol Res. 2004;92:441–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Epstein HF, Miller DM 3rd, Ortiz I, Berliner GC. Myosin and paramyosin are organized about a newly identified core structure. J Cell Biol. 1985;100(3):904–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Z, Yang J, Wei J, Yang Y, Chen X, Zhao X, et al. Trichinella spiralis paramyosin binds to C8 and C9 and protects the tissue-dwelling nematode from being attacked by host complement. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(7):e1225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao X, Hao Y, Yang J, Gu Y, Zhu X. Mapping of the complement C9 binding domain on Trichinella spiralis paramyosin. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hao Y, Zhao X, Yang J, Gu Y, Sun R, Zhu X. Monoclonal antibody targeting complement C9 binding domain of Trichinella spiralis paramyosin impairs the viability of Trichinella infective larvae in the presence of complement. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu D, Tang B, Wang Y, Zhang L, Qu Z, Shi W, et al. The immune protection induced by a serine protease from the Trichinella spiralis adult administered as DNA and protein vaccine. Acta Trop. 2020;211:105622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee SH, Li J, Moumouni PFA, Okado K, Zheng W, Liu M, et al. Subolesin vaccination inhibits blood feeding and reproduction of Haemaphysalis longicornis in rabbits. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodrguez-Mallon A, Fernndez E, Encinosa PE, Bello Y, Mndez-Prez L, Ruiz LC, et al. A novel tick antigen shows high vaccine efficacy against the dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Vaccine. 2012;30:1782–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Germain RN, Margulies DH. The biochemistry and cell biology of antigen processing and presentation. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:403–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Aguirre AA, Lobo FP, Cunha RC, Garcia MV, Andreotti R. Design of the ATAQ peptide and its evaluation as an immunogen to develop a Rhipicephalus vaccine. Vet Parasitol. 2016;221:30–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pérez-Sánchez R, Manzano-Román R, Obolo-Mvoulouga P, Oleaga A. Function-guided selection of midgut antigens from Ornithodoros erraticus ticks and an evaluation of their protective efficacy in rabbits. Vet Parasitol. 2019;272:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are sincerely grateful to Bing-Xing Shi from Nano Synthesis Company, Silicon Valley, CA, USA, for his technical help.

Funding

This work was supported by Chunhui Program from the Ministry of Education of China (Z2017018) and the Foundation of Hebei Normal University (L2020Z06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Hebei Province, College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University, No. 20 East Road of 2nd South Ring, Shijiazhuang, 050024, People’s Republic of China

    Pin-Xing Wu, Xue-Jiao Cui, Mi-Xue Cao, Li-Hong Lv, Hong-Meng Dong, Shu-Wen Xiao, Jing-Ze Liu & Yong-Hong Hu

Authors
  1. Pin-Xing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xue-Jiao Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mi-Xue Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li-Hong Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong-Meng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shu-Wen Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing-Ze Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yong-Hong Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YHH and JZL planned and organized the study. YHH and PXW drafted the manuscript and wrote the final version together with XJC. PXW, MXC and LHL performed PCR, constructed recombinant plasmids, injected vaccine, collected rabbit blood, determined antibody levels and analysed data. HMD and SWX collected samples and participated in data collection and tick feeding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing-Ze Liu or Yong-Hong Hu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Hebei Normal University as complying with the Animal protection law of the People’s Republic of China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, PX., Cui, XJ., Cao, MX. et al. Evaluation on two types of paramyosin vaccines for the control of Haemaphysalis longicornis infestations in rabbits. Parasites Vectors 14, 309 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13071-021-04812-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13071-021-04812-4

Keywords

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us