Table 4 Sample size, geographical distance, fixation index (F ST ) and P-values among populations
Pairwise comparison | Distance (km) | R. tanezumi as host | R. norvegicus as host | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | F ST | P | n | F ST | P | ||
MG vs MJ | 278.72 | 27 | 0.3180 | < 0.0001 | 28 | 0.2243 | < 0.0001 |
MG vs QB | 124.77 | 21 | 0.1491 | < 0.0001 | 25 | 0.1727 | < 0.0001 |
MG vs TH | 203.50 | 20 | 0.2040 | < 0.0001 | 30 | 0.1567 | < 0.0001 |
MG vs YJ | 250.44 | 17 | 0.4204 | 0.0023 | 21 | 0.3049 | < 0.0001 |
MJ vs QB | 217.40 | 20 | 0.1150 | 0.0068 | 23 | 0.0434 | 0.0713 |
MJ vs TH | 136.13 | 19 | 0.0665 | 0.0566 | 28 | 0.0526 | 0.0039 |
MJ vs YJ | 38.37 | 16 | 0.0445 | 0.2630 | 19 | 0.0711 | 0.0491 |
QB vs TH | 97.90 | 13 | 0.0461 | 0.2532 | 25 | 0.0196 | 0.1623 |
QB vs YJ | 180.45 | 10 | 0.2166 | 0.0155 | 16 | 0.1468 | 0.0013 |
TH vs YJ | 97.88 | 9 | 0.1388 | 0.0485 | 21 | 0.0926 | 0.0019 |