Location | Cat type | Method | Fecal positives (%) | Difference from current | Significance (χ2 test) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | Stray | Mouse bioassay | 0% | Less | p = 0 | [22] |
China | Stray | Mouse bioassay | 0% | Less | p = 0 | [20] |
Egypt | Stray | Mouse bioassay | 0% | Less | p = 0 | [21] |
Spain | Stray and pet | Microscopy | 0% | Less | p = 0 | [18] |
Colombia | Stray | Mouse bioassay | 0% | Less | p = 0 | [19] |
Europe | Stray and pet | Microscopy | 0.11% | Less | p = 0 | [33] |
Switzerland | Stray and pet | PCR | 0.30% | Less | p = 0 | [34] |
United States (CA) | Stray and pet | Microscopy | 0.90% | Less | p = 0.0001 | [35] |
Canada (PEI) | Stray | Microscopy | 1.30% | Less | p = 0.003 | [27] |
Finland | Stray | Microscopy/PCR | 1.50% | Less | p = 0.008 | [26] |
Ethiopiaa | Stray | Microscopy | 5.50% | Comparable | p = 0.85 | [28] |
Italy | Stray | PCR | 16% | Comparable | p = 0.06 | [36] |
Ethiopiaa | Stray | Mouse bioassay | 22.20% | More | p = 0.007 | [28] |