Skip to main content

Table 1 Contrasting four demographic density feedback models for O.hupensis snail density

From: Compensatory density feedback of Oncomelania hupensis populations in two different environmental settings in China

Setting

Model

AIC c

ΔAIC c

w AIC c

%DE

Overall

RW

252.568

72.111

2.1939E-16

0.0

 

EX

234.944

54.487

1.4731E-12

30.2

 

RL

197.414

16.957

0.0002

66.1

 

GL

180.457

0.000

0.9998

75.1

Jiangsu

RW

122.090

46.979

5.8346E-11

0.0

 

EX

97.919

22.808

1.0344E-05

61.2

 

RL

80.208

5.097

0.0725

81.2

 

GL

75.111

0.000

0.9275

84.3

Sichuan

RW

131.071

42.189

6.8969E-10

0.0

 

EX

129.474

40.593

1.5323E-09

13.6

 

RL

106.567

17.685

0.0001

66.3

 

GL

88.882

0.000

0.9999

82.5

  1. RW, random walk; EX, exponential growth; RL, Ricker-logistic; GL, Gompertz-logistic; %DE, % deviance explained (goodness of fit). Highest-ranked models are shown in boldface
  2. Model strength of evidence based on Akaike's information criterion corrected for small samples (AIC c ).
Back to article page

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us